The Prime Directive upholds one of Starfleet's most important principles: noninterfernce with other cultures and civilizations. The Directive is so important to Starfleet that officers swear to uphold the directive, even at the cost of their own lives or the lives of their entire crew.
The Prime Directive states: "No starship may interfere with the normal development of any alien life or society."
Interference with a society could be:
However, there is a bit of a double standard to the Prime Directive. Prime Directive primarily applied to societies that had little to no actual knowledge of other worlds and space-faring civilizations. But it also applied to the internal affairs of societies which knew extensively of other worlds (for example, interference in purely internal affairs by Starfleet was not permitted in the Klingon Civil War). Human colonies were excluded from its coverage all together, and by virtue of joining the United Federation of Planets member planets were subject to its laws, regulations, and authority. Basically, the closer ties a civilization had to the Federation or Earth the greater amount of interference in that civilization that was tolerated by the Prime Directive.
Interference with a society could be:
- Providing knowledge of other inhabited worlds (even if individuals or governments in the society were already aware of such)
- Providing knowledge of technologies or science
- Taking actions to generally affect a society's overall development
- Taking actions which support one faction within a society over another
- Helping a society escape the negative consequences of its own actions
- Helping a society escape a natural disaster known to the society, even if inaction would result in a society's extinction
- Helping a society escape a natural disaster known to the society, even if inaction would result in a society's extinction
- Interfering in the internal affairs of a society
However, there is a bit of a double standard to the Prime Directive. Prime Directive primarily applied to societies that had little to no actual knowledge of other worlds and space-faring civilizations. But it also applied to the internal affairs of societies which knew extensively of other worlds (for example, interference in purely internal affairs by Starfleet was not permitted in the Klingon Civil War). Human colonies were excluded from its coverage all together, and by virtue of joining the United Federation of Planets member planets were subject to its laws, regulations, and authority. Basically, the closer ties a civilization had to the Federation or Earth the greater amount of interference in that civilization that was tolerated by the Prime Directive.
Some actions are clearly forbidden by the Prime Directive when it did apply to a society. Others are subject to interpretation. Commanding officers in Starfleet are given great discretionary powers regarding how and whether the Prime Directive would apply to specific situations. This promoted debate among command crews about whether the Prime Directive would (or should) apply, and how best to balance competing ethical priorities. If a decision was made by the commanding officer that could potentially be a violation of the Prime Directive, the conclusions and rationale would need to be recorded and justified to Starfleet through the ship's or station's logs. Anyone found to have violated the Prime Directive (including through claiming an unjustified exception or having a weak rationale regarding actions otherwise constituting a violation) could result in punishment ranging from a formal reprimand all the way to arrest and court martial.
There are a few exceptions, but these exceptions don't completely void the Prime Directive. It [the Prime Directive] was only suspended to the extent minimally necessary to address the matter at hand (e.g., answer a hail, provide rescue assistance). Also, actions were to be handled in a way that attempted to minimize the interference resulting from the limited suspension. For example, the attempted "repair" of prior cultural interference was not, itself, to be done in a way that would lead to even greater interference.
There are a few exceptions, but these exceptions don't completely void the Prime Directive. It [the Prime Directive] was only suspended to the extent minimally necessary to address the matter at hand (e.g., answer a hail, provide rescue assistance). Also, actions were to be handled in a way that attempted to minimize the interference resulting from the limited suspension. For example, the attempted "repair" of prior cultural interference was not, itself, to be done in a way that would lead to even greater interference.
- The society already knew of and contacted the Federation (e.g., seeking assistance; treaty matters)
- The society sent a general distress call to any space-faring cultures who might pick it up
- A material injustice involving a Federation citizen would occur absent the interference
- Compliance with specific (and valid) orders that could not be followed if the Prime Directive fully applied (e.g., ancillary to a war with the Federation; first contact missions; diplomatic missions; trade negotiations)
- The society hails or attacks a Federation vessel
- Rescue missions
- The society is in diplomatic discussions with the Federation
- The society was previously interfered with by Federation citizens, whether or not in violation of the Prime Directive (e.g., prior to the Prime Directive being in force; accidental interference)
- The society was previously interfered with by non-Federation citizens (e.g., Klingons) in a manner that would have violated the Prime Directive had it been done by Starfleet personnel
- The society had been contacted by Starfleet but, upon recommendation by the contact/survey team, the planet was nonetheless subject to the Prime Directive as though such contact had not occurred
While it does seem like it would be very easy to justify breaking the Prime Directive, you have to keep in mind that Star Trek takes place well into the future. Ideas and concepts are different and humanity itself has evolved in a way that makes the Prime Directive work to its full potential and purpose. Yes, there are some flaws and beliefs regarding the degree of flexibility that applies to the Prime Directive varies from captain to captain. Captain Kirk, noted that the Prime Directive was intended to apply only to living, growing civilizations and felt it was appropriate to interfere where societies had been enslaved or were in a state of total stagnation. He also attempted at least once to interfere in the internal affairs of a civilization when he believed that higher ethics compelled or justified such actions. Meanwhile, both Captains Picard and Janeway were prepared to watch whole societies perish from natural causes rather than interfere – even when others were seeking to prevail upon them that Starfleet's role should permit actively saving societies rather than passively watching them die.
The Prime Directive plays its role well in Star Trek. I always find it interesting and enlightening to watch a captain and their commanding officers debate about whether their actions would violate the Prime Directive or not. There are moments when I do in fact wish they said, "Screw the Prime Directive, I'm going to do this anyway." But there are also moments when I see what they see and can see the possible consequences to their actions. The Prime Directive is a beautiful thing and something I wish our society had the capacity to process and uphold. Sanders out.
"The Prime Directive is not just a set of rules; it is a philosophy... and a very correct one. History has proven again and again that whenever mankind interferes with a less developed civilization, no matter how well intentioned that interference may be, the results are invariably disastrous."– Captain Jean-Luc Picard
No comments:
Post a Comment